Heating (and frostbitten teddy bears)

with No Comments

I’m working from home today and, as I sit here (a) on a conference call going nowhere and (b) freezing in my basement with the thermostat set to 60F, I began to wonder: is turning down the heat really worth it?

After some investigation, I feel a bit better that I’m not trying to re-establish all the world’s glaciers here in my office for no reason.  First, it looks like 27% of residential energy use is taken up by space heating, another 12% by space cooling.  Here in our household, we’ve reduced thermostat temperatures by 5 degrees F in the winter alone.  According to this site, bumping the temperature up or down 2 degrees can reduce your carbon output by 2,000 pounds.

While 2,000 pounds sounds big, I always feel lost in all the units associated with quantifying my footprint.  So, to check my understanding, it looks like the average house in the U.S. has a footprint of 20 metric tons (and of course, those bastards switched to metric just to mess with me).  There are about 2,200 pounds in a metric ton (yes, I knew that on my own, and no, I definitely did not rely on google–just get out of here).  So, changing by a couple degrees can reduce your footprint by a bit under 1/20.  If you reduce by four degrees, that’s 10%-ish.  And for us, that’s 10% is just in winter.

Someone should check my math here.  Odds are it’s wrong.

Long story short, this doesn’t seem to be for naught (sighs, as he reaches for his parka).   

Share this page

Leave a Reply